All Posts (673)

Sort by

Published May 17, 2012

Troy Anderson is a mentally ill inmate in isolation at the Colorado State Penitentiary, deemed for more than a decade too dangerous to be among other offenders.

3321844040?profile=original

His lawyers argue, however, that prolonged solitary confinement is contributing to a vicious cycle, making his psychiatric conditions worse and resulting in misbehavior that warrants further punishment.

Prison officials defend the practice, saying administrative segregation, which can include up to 23 hours a day alone in a concrete cell, is a fundamental part of security.

Art Leonardo, executive director of the North American Association of Wardens and Superintendents, says keeping prisoners away from the general population is a way to "keep them from being harmed."

But prisoners' rights advocates around the nation say putting mentally ill inmates in long-term solitary confinement amounts to cruel and unusual punishment. In some states, activists are pushing court challenges to get convicts, such as Anderson, out of isolation.

"People with mental illness suffer horribly in solitary confinement," said David Fathi, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's National Prison Project.

Anderson, represented by University of Denver law students, last week appeared before a federal judge in Denver to ask for better medication for conditions said to lead to panic attacks. He's also asking to be let outside three times a week.

Colorado Department of Corrections spokeswoman Katherine Sanguinetti says prison officials use isolation "to maintain offender and staff safety."

Inmates' rights activists might concede that temporary isolation has its place, but Anderson's lawyers say he has been in solitary for 12 years, and it's not helping.

Long-term isolation has "become an integral part of how we manage prisons in this country," Fathi said.

The National Prison Project has handled about 10 cases in the last dozen years dealing with mentally ill inmates indefinitely kept in isolation, Fathi said.

There are no statistics detailing how many of the more than 218,000 federal prison inmates are considered mentally ill. Similarly, there is no official estimate as to how many inmates are placed in solitary confinement.

U.S. Bureau of Justice statistics show that in 2010 there were more than 1.4 million inmates in state prisons. However, there are no official estimates for how many state prisoners are mentally ill or in isolation.

Cases involving inmates such as Anderson, convicted of attempted murder in 2000, are coming with increasing regularity, inmates' rights advocates say. The outcomes have been varied.

Lawyers on behalf of a North Carolina inmate with severe paranoid schizophrenia, depression and borderline personality disorder argued last year that a decade of solitary confinement, which sometimes included being shackled inside his cell, worsened his conditions considerably.

But a judge ruled against them, and Michael A. Williams remains in isolation.

A federal jury in January awarded $22 million to a New Mexico inmate who extracted a tooth by hand, rocking it back and forth in the socket for hours, after going without medical or dental care while in solitary confinement for two years.

Stephen Slevin had been isolated because he was depressed and someone checked a box on a form indicating he was suicidal, according to his attorney.

A pending class action lawsuit headed by a South Carolina advocacy group says the state has been punishing mentally ill inmates without giving them enough access to psychiatric care.

One of the four prisoners represented in the suit spent nearly 24 hours a day in his cell for 16 years and saw a counselor only once a month, according to court documents.

Defense lawyers, in closing arguments in March, said South Carolina prison officials are doing their best to treat mentally ill inmates with the limited money they receive from the state. A judge is considering the case.

Psychiatrist Stuart Grassian says that long-term isolation for prisoners who need psychiatric help is counterproductive. He says the typical approach from prison officials — "if you punish bad behavior, it'll eventually get better" — does not work for mentally ill inmates without proper medical treatment.

Leonardo, head of the prison officials group, says that while isolation is not ideal, administrative segregation is the best way to manage inmates who pose a threat and need special care.

"A number of years ago, we began in this country to stop institutionalizing people who had mental illnesses. We just put them in jail. Jails really are not prepared or staffed in most cases to deal with them."

Laura Rovner, a law professor at the University of Denver whose students helped represent Anderson, says part of the reason behind the push for more lawsuits are mental health advocates proclaiming that isolation practices do not work.

"Being put in isolation," Rovner said, "is likely going to make you worse."

Read more…

Among the Thorns

A Rose Among Thorns

 

3321844395?profile=originalWHILE STROLLING THROUGH THE FIELDS OF TIME

THERE ARE  MANY THINGS TO SEE

BUT NATURE IS THE GREATEST SIGHT

THAT THERE COULD EVER BE

THE GREATEST OF THEM ALL YOU SEE

IS HOW THE WORLD WAS FORMED

AND WHY A ROSE IS THERE TO LIVE

EACH DAY AMONG THE THORNS

 

   

 

ONE DAY AMONG THE WORLD OF THORNS3321844430?profile=original

A ROSE BEGAN TO GROW

IT WAS THE GREATEST GIFT OF GOD

THIS WORLD WILL EVER KNOW

IT  WAS THE WILL OF GOD TO SHOW

THAT  SINCE THE WORLD WAS  FORMED

THERE HAD TO BE A ROSE TO LIVE

AND DIE AMONG THE THORNS

 

 A mentally ill inmate is "A Rose Among the Thorns" when THOSE around them is either

unpleasant, aversive, antipathetic, apathetic, callous, cold-blooded,

disinterested, hard, harsh, heartless, icy, indifferent, insensitive and incompetent!

 When you find "A Rose Among Thorns"

you find a soft flower among the sharp thorns.

A rose among the thorns mean anything nice found among

not-so-nice things.

 

DID I MISS ANY WORDS? IF SO, ADD THEM TO THE LIST....Inhumanity..Illiterate, Controlling, Dictator......

Peace and Love

YaVon

Read more…

1 and 100 US Adults behind bars....

Published: February 28, 2008

For the first time in the nation’s history, more than one in 100 American adults is behind bars, according to a new report.

Multimedia

Related

Text of the Report (pewcenteronthestates.org)

Nationwide, the prison population grew by 25,000 last year, bringing it to almost 1.6 million. Another 723,000 people are in local jails. The number of American adults is about 230 million, meaning that one in every 99.1 adults is behind bars.

Incarceration rates are even higher for some groups. One in 36 Hispanic adults is behind bars, based on Justice Department figures for 2006. One in 15 black adults is, too, as is one in nine black men between the ages of 20 and 34.

The report, from the Pew Center on the States, also found that only one in 355 white women between the ages of 35 and 39 are behind bars but that one in 100 black women are.

The report’s methodology differed from that used by the Justice Department, which calculates the incarceration rate by using the total population rather than the adult population as the denominator. Using the department’s methodology, about one in 130 Americans is behind bars.

Either way, said Susan Urahn, the center’s managing director, “we aren’t really getting the return in public safety from this level of incarceration.”

But Paul Cassell, a law professor at the University of Utah and a former federal judge, said the Pew report considered only half of the cost-benefit equation and overlooked the “very tangible benefits — lower crime rates.”

In the past 20 years, according the Federal Bureau of Investigation, violent crime rates fell by 25 percent, to 464 for every 100,000 people in 2007 from 612.5 in 1987.

“While we certainly want to be smart about who we put into prisons,” Professor Cassell said, “it would be a mistake to think that we can release any significant number of prisoners without increasing crime rates. One out of every 100 adults is behind bars because one out of every 100 adults has committed a serious criminal offense.”

Ms. Urahn said the nation cannot afford the incarceration rate documented in the report. “We tend to be a country in which incarceration is an easy response to crime,” she said. “Being tough on crime is an easy position to take, particularly if you have the money. And we did have the money in the ‘80s and ‘90s.”

Now, with fewer resources available, the report said, “prison costs are blowing a hole in state budgets.” On average, states spend almost 7 percent on their budgets on corrections, trailing only healthcare, education and transportation.

In 2007, according to the National Association of State Budgeting Officers, states spent $44 billion in tax dollars on corrections. That is up from $10.6 billion in 1987, a 127 increase once adjusted for inflation. With money from bonds and the federal government included, total state spending on corrections last year was $49 billion. By 2011, the report said, states are on track to spend an additional $25 billion.

It cost an average of $23,876 dollars to imprison someone in 2005, the most recent year for which data were available. But state spending varies widely, from $45,000 a year in Rhode Island to $13,000 in Louisiana.

The cost of medical care is growing by 10 percent annually, the report said, and will accelerate as the prison population ages.

About one in nine state government employees works in corrections, and some states are finding it hard to fill those jobs. California spent more than $500 million on overtime alone in 2006.

The number of prisoners in California dropped by 4,000 last year, making Texas’s prison system the nation’s largest, at about 172,000. But the Texas legislature last year approved broad changes to the corrections system there, including expansions of drug treatment programs and drug courts and revisions to parole practices.

“Our violent offenders, we lock them up for a very long time — rapists, murderers, child molestors,” said John Whitmire, a Democratic state senator from Houston and the chairman of the state senate’s criminal justice committee. “The problem was that we weren’t smart about nonviolent offenders. The legislature finally caught up with the public.”

He gave an example.

“We have 5,500 D.W.I offenders in prison,” he said, including people caught driving under the influence who had not been in an accident. “They’re in the general population. As serious as drinking and driving is, we should segregate them and give them treatment.”

The Pew report recommended diverting nonviolent offenders away from prison and using punishments short of reincarceration for minor or technical violations of probation or parole. It also urged states to consider earlier release of some prisoners.

Before the recent changes in Texas, Mr. Whitmire said, “we were recycling nonviolent offenders.”

Read more…
Comments: 0

Urgent: Save Troy Davis' Life

Dear M.I.S.S. Family,

In 1991, Troy Davis was convicted of murdering a white police officer. Though there's major evidence that Davis didn't commit the crime, Georgia is prepared to put him to death. We have a good chance of stopping this -- but only if we speak up now.

The fact is, no physical evidence connected Davis to the murder. Seven of the original nine witnesses have recanted, with many saying their testimony was a result of law enforcement pressure. Of the remaining witnesses, one is highly suspect and the other could be the actual culprit in the officer's murder.
Now, despite these and other facts, the state of Georgia has taken the first steps toward Davis' execution -- and only the Georgia Board of Pardons and Parole stands between Davis and the lethal injection chamber.
Georgia may be about to kill an innocent man. That's not justice. Please join me and my friends at ColorOfChange.org in asking the Georgia Parole Board to spare Troy Davis' life, before it's too late:
Georgia Parole Board

3321839928?profile=original
Since Troy Davis' 1991 conviction, numerous facts have emerged that introduce significant doubt as to his guilt.

These facts include:


* All but two of the original witnesses against Troy Davis have signed affidavits recanting their earlier testimony. Most claim that their testimony was coerced by police officers.[1]


* Multiple witnesses say that another man -- one of the original witnesses against Davis -- has claimed to have slain the fallen officer.[2]


The weapon used in the murder was never found. The only physical evidence connecting Davis to the crime was circumstantial -- and new testimony disputes Davis's connection to that evidence.[3]


* In light of this evidence, the Supreme Court granted Davis another chance. But instead of an actual new trial before a jury, which would mean the burden of proof beyond a reasonable doubt is on the prosecutor, he got an evidentiary hearing before a single federal judge where Davis' lawyers had the burden to meet an impossibly high and undefined legal standard.


Unbelievably, the judge rejected the new evidence and cleared the way for Davis' execution. But even he acknowledged lingering doubt, noting that the case against Davis was not "ironclad."


But "ironclad" is exactly what the evidence should be in order to put someone to death. If the Georgia Board of Pardons and Parole doesn't act to stop Davis' execution, they'll run a serious risk of putting an innocent man to death. That is not acceptable.


Please join me and my friends at ColorOfChange.org in asking the Georgia Board of Pardons and Parole to save Troy Davis' life by commuting his sentence to life in prison. And when you do, please ask your friends and family to do the same.


Act Color of Change.org


Thanks.

 

YaVon Best

Best3Concepts

 


Read more…
March 22, 2011 - False confessions, invalid forensic analysis, eyewitness misidentifications and other systemic flaws in the criminal justice system contributed to the wrongful conviction of the first 250 people exonerated by DNA tests, University of Virginia law professor Brandon Garrett writes in "Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong," published this spring by Harvard University Press.Media-Newswire.com) - March 22, 2011 — False confessions, invalid forensic analysis, eyewitness misidentifications and other systemic flaws in the criminal justice system contributed to the wrongful conviction of the first 250 people exonerated by DNA tests, University of Virginia law professor Brandon Garrett writes in "Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal Prosecutions Go Wrong," published this spring by Harvard University Press.Garrett began by studying the original criminal trial records of the 250 people who were convicted of series crimes and later exonerated. "The goal was to see what patterns there are," he said.In a way, it would have been a comfort if the wrongful convictions had resulted from idiosyncratic mistakes or even corruption, Garrett said. That would suggest that false convictions are exceedingly rare, as nearly all police officers, prosecutors and judges conscientiously seek to convict the guilty and free the innocent, he said."What I found, though, was that the errors that repeated over and over again across the 250 cases were the result of bad barrels, and not a few bad apples. They resulted from unsound but systemic practices that allowed well-intentioned people to contribute to convicting the innocent," he said.Those practices included the use of suggestive eyewitness identification procedures, flawed forensic analysis, coercive interrogations, shoddy investigative practices, cognitive bias and poor lawyering, he said.What was particularly haunting about the cases, Garrett said, was that at the time, before the DNA tests proved the convict's innocence, many of the prosecutions appeared uncannily strong. For example, some cases included false confessions in which innocent suspects seemingly supplied police with details of a crime that police claimed could only be known by the perpetrator. The false confessions were typically the result of long, undocumented interrogations in which investigators may have planted details of the crime with the suspect, he said.One case studied in the book was that of Earl Washington. On Jan. 20, 1984, Washington – defended for 40 minutes by a lawyer who had never tried a death penalty case – was found guilty of rape and murder and sentenced to death. After nine years on Virginia's death row, DNA testing cast doubt on his conviction and saved his life. However, he spent another eight years in prison before more sophisticated DNA technology proved his innocence and convicted the guilty man.As a young lawyer in New York, Garrett said he saw the reality of such cases as Washington's and the others he analyzed. After law school, he worked at a firm in which Johnny Cochran was a partner, as were Peter Neufeld and Barry Scheck, the founders of the Innocence Project, an advocacy group that works to overturn wrongful convictions.While there, Garrett was involved in representing a young soldier who had been charged with the rape of an elderly woman. The young man had been in a minor traffic accident near the scene of the crime shortly after it occurred."Detectives brought him in and interrogated him over many hours," Garrett said. "Ultimately he confessed, falsely, thinking that if he just parroted what they demanded that he say, he could finally go home. Instead, he was convicted by a jury and he spent 10 years in prison. DNA testing eventually proved his innocence."Garrett's new book is an extension of previous studies he has done on the 250 cases. He wrote a groundbreaking study, "Judging Innocence," on the appeals and post-conviction process in cases in which the defendants were later cleared by DNA evidence, and later examined forensic analysis and confessions in that group of the wrongfully convicted.Garrett began thinking about writing a book after the National Academy of Sciences asked him about the role forensic analysis played in those cases. He realized the only way to know for sure was to study the original trial transcripts. So he gathered more than 200 of them, with research support from the Law School and a two-year grant from the Open Society Institute. With the help of a team of student research assistants, he began meticulously reviewing the trials and coding their features.Garrett fears that the types of errors that contributed to the convictions – unreliable witness testimony, forensic errors, false confessions – are not exclusive to cases in which DNA samples are available."What I saw in these 250 cases gave me grave concerns about the accuracy of other criminal cases in which DNA testing can't give us the answers," he said.The criminal justice system is slow to reform, in part because it is fragmented and made up of so many investigative agencies and court systems at the local, state and federal level, he said."You have to remember that just because you don't get so many DNA exonerations in recent cases, for a wonderful reason – DNA testing is now routine before trial – it doesn't mean that the same problems with forensics, with confessions, with eyewitnesses, or with the adversary process itself aren't still serious ones," he said.Fortunately, he said, policymakers are increasingly taking very seriously the lessons that can be learned from the high-profile wrongful convictions that have come to light. In the last chapter of his new book, Garrett describes a criminal procedure revolution, as jurisdictions have begun to gradually adopt improved eyewitness identification procedures, mandatory interrogation recording requirements, forensic science reforms, innocence commissions and improved criminal discovery practices, among others.In part because the data may be of interest to researchers and policymakers, Garrett has also made available resources related to the book on a website hosted by U.Va.'s Law School.http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/Science_Thursdays_Crime_Labs_Under_Investigation_for_Inconsistent_Results.php
Read more…

By Boyce Watkins, PhD on Jan 4th 2011 12:37PM


Prison reform is not about saving guilty people. It's about saving our families who've been historically persecuted by a system that has its roots in slavery. For African Americans, and many others, there is no justice in our so-called justice system.

 

Cornelius Dupree (pictured) was sent to prison in 1979 on charges of rape and robbery. After doing more than 30 years in prison, he has finally been set free by the Innocence Project.
3321839896?profile=original
Dupree served more time in a Texas prison than any other innocent person in the history of the state. There are only two others in this country who have served more time and been exonerated, according to the Innocence Project:

"Cornelius Dupree spent the prime of his life behind bars because of mistaken identification that probably would have been avoided if the best practices now used in Dallas had been employed," said Barry Scheck, co-director of the Innocence Project. "Let us never forget that, as in the heartbreaking case of Cornelius Dupree, a staggering 75 percent of wrongful convictions of people later cleared by DNA evidence resulted from mis-identifications."

Dupree is now 51 years old. He was accused of being in a group of two men who forced a woman and her male friend in to a car and then raping the woman. Dupree was identified by the woman in a police lineup, but the male did not identify him. At trial, though, both victims claimed that Dupree and Anthony Massingill were the men who committed the crime, and Dupree was given 75 years in prison.


For three decades, Dupree fought for his innocence and was turned down for appeal on all three occasions. The Texas prison system is known for being the harshest and most racist justice system in the United States.

According to Robert Perkinson, a historian at The University of Hawaii, the Texas prison system gave 30 years to Lee Otis Johnson, a black power advocate who simply passed a joint to an undercover officer. To this day, there are seven times more black prison inmates in Texas than whites, according to Professor Perkinson's book "Texas Tough: The Rise and Fall of the Prison Emprire."

Whether in the state of Texas or in a place like Georgia, where the inmates went on strike last month, prison reform is needed. If you believe that Cornelius Dupree is the only innocent man behind bars, you're sadly mistaken.

The truth is that the Innocence Project, as brilliant as it may be, only has the resources to investigate a limited number of cases. Additionally, most of the men and women freed by the Innocence Project happen to be African American. This argues for the necessity of black organizations, politicians and regular citizens to supplement the great work of the Innocence Project by demanding substantial reform in the Prison Industrial Complex.

 

Let's do our part to advocate for our love ones freedom, NOW!


 Peace and Love

YaVon

Read more…

WHY WE MUST FIX OUR PRISONS

Inmates at a facility in California, a state that spent almost $10 billion on corrections last year

By Senator Jim Webb
published: 03/29/2009


America's criminal justice system has deteriorated to the point that it is a national disgrace. Its irregularities and inequities cut against the notion that we are a society founded on fundamental fairness. Our failure to address this problem has caused the nation's prisons to burst their seams with massive overcrowding, even as our neighborhoods have become more dangerous. We are wasting billions of dollars and diminishing millions of lives.

We need to fix the system. Doing so will require a major nationwide recalculation of who goes to prison and for how long and of how we address the long-term consequences of incarceration. Twenty-five years ago, I went to Japan on assignment for PARADE to write a story on that country's prison system. In 1984, Japan had a population half the size of ours and was incarcerating 40,000 sentenced offenders, compared with 580,000 in the United States. As shocking as that disparity was, the difference between the countries now is even more astounding--and profoundly disturbing. Since then, Japan's prison population has not quite doubled to 71,000, while ours has quadrupled to 2.3 million.

The United States has by far the world's highest incarceration rate. With 5% of the world's population, our country now houses nearly 25% of the world's reported prisoners. We currently incarcerate 756 inmates per 100,000 residents, a rate nearly five times the average worldwide of 158 for every 100,000. In addition, more than 5 million people who recently left jail remain under "correctional supervision," which includes parole, probation, and other community sanctions. All told, about one in every 31 adults in the United States is in prison, in
jail, or on supervised release. This all comes at a very high price to taxpayers: Local, state, and federal spending on corrections adds up to about $68 billion a year.

Our overcrowded, ill-managed prison systems are places of violence, physical abuse, and hate, making them breeding grounds that perpetuate and magnify the same types of behavior we purport to fear. Post-incarceration re-entry programs are haphazard or, in some places, nonexistent, making it more difficult for former offenders who wish to overcome the stigma of
having done prison time and become full, contributing members of society. And, in the face of the movement toward mass incarceration, law-enforcement officials in many parts of the U.S. have been overwhelmed and unable to address a dangerous wave of organized, frequently violent gang activity,
much of it run by leaders who are based in other countries.


With so many of our citizens in prison compared with the rest of the world, there are only two possibilities: Either we are home to the most evil people on earth or we are doing something different--and vastly counterproductive. Obviously, the answer is the latter.

Over the past two decades, we have been incarcerating more and more people for nonviolent crimes and for acts that are driven by mental illness or drug dependence. The U.S. Department of Justice estimates that 16% of the adult inmates in American prisons and jails--which means more than 350,000 of those locked up--suffer from mental illness, and the percentage in juvenile custody is even higher. Our correctional institutions are also heavily populated by the "criminally ill," including inmates who suffer from HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and hepatitis.


Drug offenders, most of them passive users or minor dealers, are swamping our prisons. According to data supplied to Congress' Joint Economic Committee, those imprisoned for drug offenses rose from 10% of the inmate population to approximately 33% between 1984 and 2002. Experts estimate that this increase accounts for about half of the dramatic escalation in the total number imprisoned over that period. Yet locking up more of these offenders has done nothing to break up the power of the multibillion-dollar illegal drug trade. Nor has it
brought about a reduction in the amounts of the more dangerous drugs--such as cocaine, heroin, and
methamphetamines--that are reaching our citizens.

Justice statistics also show that 47.5% of all the drug arrests in our country in 2007 were for marijuana offenses. Additionally, nearly 60% of the people in state prisons serving time for a drug offense had no history of violence or of any significant selling activity. Indeed, four out of five drug arrests were for possession of illegal substances, while only one out of five was for sales. Three-quarters of the drug offenders in our state prisons were there for nonviolent or purely drug offenses. And although experts have found little statistical difference among racial groups regarding actual drug use, African-Americans--who make up about 12% of the total U.S.
population--accounted for 37% of those arrested on drug charges, 59% of those convicted, and 74% of
all drug offenders sentenced to prison.

Against this backdrop of chaos and mismanagement, a dangerous form of organized and sometimes deadly gang activity has infiltrated America's towns and cities. It comes largely from our country's southern border, and much of the criminal activity centers around the movement of illegal drugs. The weapons and tactics involved are of the highest order.

The Mexican drug cartels, whose combined profits are estimated at $25 billion a year, are known to employ many elite former soldiers who were trained in some of America's most sophisticated military programs. Their brutal tactics took the lives of more than 6000 Mexicans last year alone, and the bloodshed has been spilling over the border into our own neighborhoods at a rapid pace. One terrible result is that Phoenix, Ariz., has become the kidnapping capital of the United States, with more than 370 cases in 2008. That is more incidents than in any other city in the world outside of Mexico City.


The challenge to our communities is not limited to the states that border Mexico. Mexican cartels are now reported to be running operations in some 230 American cities. Other gang activity--much of it directed from Latin America, Asia, and Europe--has permeated our country to the point that no area is immune. As one example, several thousand members of the Central American gang MS-13 now operate in northern Virginia, only a stone's throw from our nation's capital.


In short, we are not protecting our citizens from the increasing danger of criminals who perpetrate violence and intimidation as a way of life, and we are locking up too many people who do not belong in jail. It is incumbent on our national leadership to find a way to fix our prison system. I believe that American ingenuity can discover better ways to deal with the problems of drugs and nonviolent criminal behavior while still minimizing violent
crime and large-scale gang activity. And we all deserve to live in a country made better by such changes.
Read more…
Comments: 1


Dr. John P. May is chief medical officer at Armor Correctional Health Services, a minority-owned enterprise incorporated in the state of Florida that provides comprehensive medical, dental and mental health services exclusively for inmates in jails and prisons.


Meeting the health needs of some of the sickest and most complex patients in our community is the responsibility and privilege of those who deliver healthcare in jails and prisons. Like those in uniform who also protect and serve, these healthcare providers must maintain professionalism, integrity, competency and ethics in challenging environments that are often ill-designed for healing and far from therapeutic. These healthcare providers advocate for and deliver services in the best interests of their inmate patients. The community ought to appreciate and support these efforts, even if only because the community's own health and safety ultimately benefit when proper care is given to inmates.


The impact of incarceration on public health is significant. Incarcerated populations are known to have high rates of transmissible diseases because of preexisting problems including poor access to healthcare, high risk lifestyles and living in close quarters. Frequently landing in jail or prison marks the first time these individuals have had access to medical services, mental health treatment and dental care. Often substance addiction complicates disease processes and treatments.


Each year in the United States more than 12 million people are released from jails and prisons. A slightly larger number enter each year, owing to a steady increase in our jail and prison populations. This is an important intervention point for screening, treating and preventing disease. A report to the U.S. Congress by the National Commission on Correctional Healthcare shows an estimated 98,500 to 145,500 inmates released from U.S. prisons and jails in 1996 were HIV carriers. Another 38,500 had AIDS, and an additional 155,000 were infected with hepatitis B while another 1.3 million to 1.4 illion were infected with hepatitis C. In Florida, an HIV test is mandatory prior to leaving the state's prison system and is typically available to jail and prison inmates upon request, along with other preventive health information.



Learn More about Experiments on Prisoners


Women are screened for cervical and breast cancer, while men are tested for prostate cancer. Vaccinations are administered, along with other preventive healthcare. Failure to identify and treat disease among prisoners and failure to provide a continuum of health and social services to those transitioning from jail or prison perpetuates disease and disenfranchisement, resulting in higher healthcare costs for everyone. Through an adequate jail or prison-based health program of disease screening, treatment and discharge planning, the negative impact of health conditions that affect the public can be minimized.



Nonetheless, healthcare for inmates is often rejected by both the public and public officials. Had it not been for a Supreme Court judgment ruling that prisoners have a right to adequate healthcare, few would receive it at all. And this despite the fact that the purpose of jails and prisons is public safety, and part of public safety is protecting the public's health.


The physician's creed -- in Latin primum non nocere or ``first, do no harm'' -- guides those of us providing healthcare to incarcerated persons to build care systems that meet our patients' needs and insure that during their incarceration they are not vulnerable to health deterioration. The task is not easy, and it's made more difficult by those who do not value our mission. If only for reasons of self-interest, prison healthcare deserves public support.


Assigning disparate values to the lives of prisoners in comparison with those of the general public puts the community in peril. Infectious diseases do not respect the boundaries of prison walls, nor can we forget that the prisoner will once again walk among us.


Read more…

How to Become An Advocate

This post is about sharing ideas and techniques that we can use to become better advocates at each stage of the advocacy process.

3321839547?profile=original

We have a common cause: Alleviating the unjust suffering of our child, loved one, spouse, or friend who deserves to be treated better while incarcerated.

As a member of M.I.S.S. we must make a commitment to advocate for those who are unable fight for themselves. Therefore, I did a little research and found this information that may help us to get our thinking caps on and share ideas.

1. Defining the Problem – What problem are we addressing here? What, specifically, do we want to accomplish? Let's start by describing some easy techniques for exploring our challenge and keep things positive. Using one or two good ideas will give us a much clearer indication of what we want to do or need to do.


2. Defining a Good Idea – Take a few minutes ahead of time and think about the criteria that define a good idea. We need to at least spend time considering our resources, our mission, our environment and the time-frame in question.


3. Generating Ideas – Traditional, informal brainstorming can come into play at this stage. We know how to do that sort of brainstorming. However, we may not know about the many techniques that exist for generating ideas. But we can learn to be more creative.

 

4. Evaluating Ideas – An informal process of comparing our list of ideas to the criteria that define a good idea. Many ideas are rather weak in their original form. Don’t worry about that! Let's take promising ideas and reinforce them.


5. Deciding What to Do – Taking time to formally study a decision is usually a good idea. Some decisions are simple enough to make without much research or analysis. For the other decisions that come at us, there is a need to develop a formal method for deciding what to do.

6. Doing SomethingThis is the obvious last step in any advocacy effort. We can describe some principles and practices that can lead to better results. Just remember, even a small improvement (however defined) in two or three parts of the process can really make a difference!

(If you are just getting into the advocacy game after the cause and general approach have been defined you can still use the tools and techniques referenced above.)


Who wants to study these techniques and apply them to our mission? I do!

 

We need all the suggestions we can get to effect a change in our justice system!

 

Together we can do the "UN-DO-ABLE"

 

3321840065?profile=original

 

Peace, Love and Blessings

YaVon

 

Read more…

Do You Remember When?

Terrence, was born on January 31st, 1980. I purposely moved from New York State to the state of Virginia when I was four months pregnant.

I wanted to move to a better environment, where raising a son, especially a Black son, would not be hazardous to his health and well being.


I remember the day he was born just like it was yesterday. I was three weeks over due. My due date was January 10th. Well, since I needed to work as long as possible before his birth, I mentally forced myself to hold him in just long enough to get a few more paychecks.


Three more to be exact and he came 21 days later. My last day at work was Friday and I went into labor on Monday while watching the Young and the Restless.


When he was born later that day, at 11:14 p.m., I was elated and over joyed. You see, I planned to have Terrence. I used his father to get pregnant and then left town. All I wanted was a baby, not him. I was well educated, self-sufficient, and able to take care of myself and my two children. I will always remember that day, the day he was born........ Life was beautiful!

Do you remember the day your son was born?
Let's hear your story too..It will lighten your heart to share it with us.

Peace and Love Always
YaVon






Read more…

An inmate at the Ohio River Valley Juvenile Correctional Facility. Two-thirds of the nation’s juvenile inmates have at least one mental illness, according to surveys. By SOLOMON MOORE Published: August 9, 2009 FRANKLIN FURNACE, Ohio — The teenager in the padded smock sat in his solitary confinement cell here in this state’s most secure juvenile prison and screamed obscenities. The youth, Donald, a 16-year-old, his eyes glassy from lack of sleep and a daily regimen of mood stabilizers, was serving a minimum of six months for breaking and entering. Although he had received diagnoses for psychiatric illnesses, including bipolar disorder, a judge decided that Donald would get better care in the state correctional system than he could get anywhere in his county. That was two years ago. Donald’s confinement has been repeatedly extended because of his violent outbursts. This year he assaulted a guard here at the prison, the Ohio River Valley Juvenile Correctional Facility, and was charged anew, with assault. His fists and forearms are striped with scars where he gouged himself with pencils and the bones of a bird he caught and dismembered. As cash-starved states slash mental health programs in communities and schools, they are increasingly relying on the juvenile corrections system to handle a generation of young offenders with psychiatric disorders. About two-thirds of the nation’s juvenile inmates — who numbered 92,854 in 2006, down from 107,000 in 1999 — have at least one mental illness, according to surveys of youth prisons, and are more in need of therapy than punishment. “We’re seeing more and more mentally ill kids who couldn’t find community programs that were intensive enough to treat them,” said Dr. Joseph Penn, director of mental health services for the University of Texas Medical Branch Correctional Managed Care. “Jails and juvenile justice facilities are the new asylums.” At least 32 states cut their community mental health programs by an average of 5 percent this year and plan to double those budget reductions by 2010, according to a recent survey of state mental health offices. Juvenile prisons have been the caretaker of last resort for troubled children since the 1980s, but mental health experts say the system is in crisis, facing a soaring number of inmates reliant on multiple — and powerful — psychotropic drugs and a shortage of therapists. In California’s state system, one of the most violent and poorly managed juvenile systems in the country, according to federal investigators, three dozen youth offenders seriously injured themselves or attempted suicide in the last year — a sign, state juvenile justice experts say, of neglect and poor safety protocols. In Ohio, where Gov. Ted Strickland, a former prison psychologist, approved a 34 percent reduction in community-based mental health services to reduce a budget deficit, Thomas J. Stickrath, the director of the Department of Youth Services, said continuing cuts would swell his youth offender population. “I’m hearing from a lot of judges saying, ‘I’m sorry I’m sending so-and-so to you, but at least I know that he’ll get the treatment he can’t get in his community,’ ” Mr. Stickrath said. But youths are often subjected to neglect and violence in juvenile prisons, and studies show that mental illnesses can become worse there. George, 17, an inmate at Ohio River Valley, detailed his daily cocktail of psychiatric medications, including Abilify and Seroquel. In addition to having bipolar disorder, he is a sex offender and is H.I.V. positive — severe stigmas in prison. “I be getting punked,” he said, using prison slang to describe how gang youths routinely humiliate him. He blinked, and his leg shook uncontrollably. “They take my food, they hit me, they make me do things.” Demetrius, 16, another inmate there, said he had received a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. Officials said he has psychotic episodes and attacks other inmates. In an interview in June, he said he was receiving no mental health counseling or medications. Andrea Kruse, a spokeswoman for Mr. Stickrath, said that since July 1, he has had more than 20 counseling sessions. According to a Government Accountability Office report, in 2001, families relinquished custody of 9,000 children to juvenile justice systems so they could receive mental health services. Donald has been in and out of mental health programs since he attacked a schoolteacher at age 5. As he grew older, he became more violent until he was eventually committed to the Department of Youth Services. “I’ve begged D.Y.S. to get him into a mental facility where they’re trained to deal with people like him,” said his grandmother, who asked not to be identified because of the stigma of having a grandson who is mentally ill. “I don’t think a lockup situation is where he should be, although I don’t think he should be on the street either.” Lawsuits and federal civil rights investigations in Indiana, Maryland, Ohio and Texas have criticized juvenile corrections systems for failing to meet their obligation to prohibit cruel and unusual punishment of prisoners. Despite downsizing to about 1,650 juvenile inmates from about 10,000 youth offenders in 1996, California’s state system remains under a 2004 federal mandate to improve conditions, including mental health services — the result of a class-action lawsuit that documented the systematic physical and sexual abuse of wards. Under a plan to reduce the state juvenile inmate population, many youths who once would have been held by the state are now detained by the Los Angeles County juvenile detention system. Los Angeles County is also under a federal mandate to improve psychiatric services for juvenile inmates, especially at the six camps at its Challenger Memorial Youth Center, which holds most of the county’s medium- and high-risk offenders and most of its mentally ill ones.
Read more…
Comments: 0

America Has Lost a Generation of Black Boys

There is no longer a need for dire predictions, hand-wringing, or apprehension about losing a generation of Black Boys. It is too late. In education, employment, economics, incarceration, health, housing, and parenting, we have lost a generation of Young Black Men.

The question that remains is will we lose the next two or three generations, or possibly every generation of Black boys hereafter to the streets, negative media, gangs, drugs, poor education, unemployment, father absence, crime, violence and death.Most young Black men in the United States don’t graduate from high school. Only 35% of Black male students graduated from high school in Chicago and only 26% in New York City, according to a 2006 report by The Schott Foundation for Public Education. Only a few Black boys who finish high school actually attend college, and of those few Black boys who enter college, nationally, only 22% of them finish college.Young Black male students have the worst grades, the lowest test scores, and the highest dropout rates of all students in the country. When these young Black men don’t succeed in school, they are much more likely to succeed in the nation’s criminal justice and penitentiary system. And it was discovered recently that even when a young Black man graduates from a U.S. college, there is a good chance that he is from Africa, the Caribbean or Europe, and not the United States.Black men in prison in America have become as American as apple pie.There are more Black men in prisons and jails in the United States (about 1.1 million) than there are Black men incarcerated in the rest of the world combined. This criminalization process now starts in elementary schools with Black male children as young as six and seven years old being arrested in staggering numbers according to a 2005 report, Education on Lockdown by the Advancement Project.The rest of the world is watching and following the lead of America. Other countries including England, Canada, Jamaica, Brazil and South Africa are adopting American social policies that encourage the incarceration and destruction of young Black men. This is leading to a world-wide catastrophe. But still, there is no adequate response from the American or global Black community.Worst of all is the passivity, neglect and disengagement of the Black community concerning the future of our Black boys. We do little while the future lives of Black boys are being destroyed in record numbers. The schools that Black boys attend prepare them with skills that will make them obsolete before, and if, they graduate. In a strange and perverse way, the Black community, itself, has started to wage a kind of war against young Black men and has become part of this destructive process.Who are young Black women going to marry? Who is going to build and maintain the economies of Black communities? Who is going to anchor strong families in the Black community? Who will young Black boys emulate as they grow into men? Where is the outrage of the Black community at the destruction of its Black boys? Where are the plans and the supportive actions to change this? Is this the beginning of the end of the Black people in America?The list of those who have failed young Black men includes our government, our foundations, our schools, our media, our Black churches, our Black leaders, and even our parents. Ironically, experts say that the solutions to the problems of young Black men are simple and relatively inexpensive, but they may not be easy, practical or popular. It is not that we lack solutions as much as it is that we lack the will to implement these solutions to save Black boys. It seems that government is willing to pay billions of dollars to lock up young Black men, rather than the millions it would take to prepare them to become viable contributors and valued members of our society.Please consider these simple goals that can lead to solutions for fixing the problems of young Black menShort term1) Teach all Black boys to read at grade level by the third grade and to embrace education2) Provide positive role models for Black boys3) Create a stable home environment for Black boys that includes contact with their fathers4) Ensure that Black boys have a strong spiritual base5) Control the negative media influences on Black boys6) Teach Black boys to respect all girls and womenLong term1) Invest as much money in educating Black boys as in locking up Black men2) Help connect Black boys to a positive vision of themselves in the future3) Create high expectations and help Black boys live into those high expectations4) Build a positive peer culture for Black boys5) Teach Black boys self-discipline, culture and history6) Teach Black boys and the communities in which they live to embrace education and life-long learningMore Facts* 37.7% of Black men in the United States are not working (2006 Joint Economic Committee Study chaired by Senator Charles E. Schumer (D-NY))* 58% of Black boys in the United States do not graduate from high school (2006 Report from the Schott Foundation for Public Education)* Almost 70% of Black children are born into female, single parent households (2000 Census Report)* About 1 million Black men in the United States are in prison (U.S. Justice Department)Truth hurts…This entry was originally posted on Friday, April 13th, 2007 at 10:09 am and is filed under Welcome to the Black Parent Movement!!Peace and LoveYaVon BestBest3Concepts
Read more…
Comments: 0

A part of me....

It is very difficult for parents, particularly mothers that have children incarcerated. Often times, I have mothers tell me that they feel as though a part of them is serving time as well. I know from my own experience, this is true. Especially, if the child is at a young age at the time of the incarceration. It is though someone has hit you right in the gut. Your child is taken away and there is absolutely nothing you can do about it. Your child's life is no longer in your control, but, that of strangers and these strangers view the inmate as a number, not a human being. We as parents understand that our children have committed crimes and have to pay their due to society, so to speak. But, that does not take away the hurt, pain and embarrassment we feel. Some parents have severe bouts of guilt feelings, constantly blaming themselves for their children actions, without any warranted reason.
Read more…